At Airtop, we see tremendous value in both AI agents and workflows; each has its place in the modern automation landscape. While we've observed organizations sometimes deploying sophisticated AI agents where simpler solutions would work better, we're certainly not advocating against agents. In fact, there are numerous scenarios where agents are not just helpful, but essential. The key is understanding when to use each approach to maximize their respective strengths.
When implementing AI solutions, choosing between agents and automatons requires careful consideration of the strengths of each approach. As Nate Herk recently highlighted, there's a fundamental mismatch when we deploy these agents for deterministic processes, those with clear, predictable steps and outcomes. Using agents for deterministic processes can create challenges:
These considerations aren't arguments against agents; they're strategic insights for maximizing the impact of your AI investments. Agents deliver extraordinary value when deployed in the right contexts, where their ability to handle uncertainty and adapt to changing conditions truly shines.
At Airtop, we approach automation projects with a fundamental question: Is this process deterministic or non-deterministic?
Deterministic processes follow predictable paths. When you input X, you expect Y to happen every time. Examples include:
Non-deterministic processes involve genuine uncertainty and require judgment. Examples include:
Based on our experience implementing AI solutions across industries, we've developed a simple framework for choosing the right approach:
What we've found most effective for many organizations is a hybrid model that combines the reliability of automations with the adaptability of agents. This approach:
One of our clients, a mid-sized financial services company, initially attempted to use an AI agent for their entire customer onboarding process. The results were disappointing. Inconsistent outcomes, higher costs, and frustrated customers.
Working with their team, we redesigned the system. Efficient workflows handled standard document processing, verification checks, and account setup. AI agents were deployed only for complex risk assessments and customized financial recommendations.
The results were transformative:
Additional use cases for agents, automations, or both can be found below.
As AI technology evolves, the distinction between agents and automations may blur. However, the fundamental principle remains: use the simplest, most reliable tool to effectively accomplish the task.
At Airtop, we're committed to helping organizations make these strategic choices, ensuring AI implementation that delivers genuine business value rather than just technical impressiveness.
Are you applying AI agents where automations would be more effective? We'd love to hear about your experiences and challenges.
Happy Automating!